Re: Updating from 8.2 to 8.4

From: Adrian Klaver <aklaver(at)comcast(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Mark Morgan Lloyd <markMLl(dot)pgsql-general(at)telemetry(dot)co(dot)uk>
Subject: Re: Updating from 8.2 to 8.4
Date: 2009-12-25 20:13:04
Message-ID: 200912251213.05068.aklaver@comcast.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Friday 25 December 2009 10:27:09 am Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> Adrian Klaver wrote:
> >> although I don't know why it didn't bite on 8.2 unless it's specifically
> >> when 64-bit timestamps are processed.
> >
> > You might want to confirm your 8.4 installation is using integer
> > datetimes as there is some variability in its useage among packagers.
> > Follow this thread for one such discussion:
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2009-07/msg01119.php
>
> Thanks Adrian, noted. I'm hoping to get onto 8.4 before too long because
> of the analytic functions but that thread suggests that the best course
> of action would be to make sure that my code is robust against the new
> server and then decide on an upgrade schedule.
>
> I'm building from scratch here so all options are as default except for
> added Perl.
>
> --

Alright then, nothing worse then trying to fix a problem that does not exist :)
One other thing that came to mind in regards to the the 'changed record'
problem is whether Row Versioning has been checked in the ODBC connection
parameters?

--
Adrian Klaver
aklaver(at)comcast(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2009-12-26 02:29:16 Re: Out of space making backup
Previous Message m. hvostinski 2009-12-25 19:46:33 Clarification regarding array columns usage?