| From: | Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | New VACUUM FULL still needed? |
| Date: | 2009-12-15 02:17:10 |
| Message-ID: | 20091215111710.0FE1.52131E4D@oss.ntt.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> I have enough items emerging from HS to keep me busy much longer than I
> thought. I'll run with VF if that's OK, since I have some other related
> changes in that area and it makes sense to understand that code also, if
> OK with you.
Sure. Many users want to see HS.
BTW, New VACUUM FULL patch is waiting for being applied.
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=202
But I heard HS is attempting to modify VFI in another way or remove it
completely. Do we still need the patch, or reject it and fix VFI in HS?
Regards,
---
Takahiro Itagaki
NTT Open Source Software Center
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2009-12-15 02:26:22 | Re: New VACUUM FULL still needed? |
| Previous Message | Fred Janon | 2009-12-15 02:08:46 | Re: pgAdmin III: timestamp displayed in what time zone? |