Re: Range types

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Scott Bailey <artacus(at)comcast(dot)net>, hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Range types
Date: 2009-12-14 18:31:30
Message-ID: 20091214183130.GJ4603@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jeff Davis wrote:

> So there are certainly some user-visible API differences between the
> two, and I don't think those differences can be hidden.

ISTM you are saying we should have two types of range types.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-12-14 18:32:08 Re: Range types
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2009-12-14 18:22:03 Re: Range types