Re: Hot Standby, release candidate?

Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 6:35 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> >> Why is (1) important, and if it is important, why is it being mentioned
> >> only now? Are we saying that all previous reviewers of my work (and
> >> others') removed these without ever mentioning they had done so?
>
> > pgident will remove such white spaces and create merge conflicts for
> > everyone working on those areas of the code.
>
> What I try really hard to remove from committed patches is spurious
> whitespace changes to pre-existing code. Whether new code blocks
> exactly match pgindent's rules is less of a concern, but changing
> code you don't have to in a way that pgindent will undo later anyway
> is just useless creation of potential conflicts.
>
> The whole thing would be a lot easier if someone would put together an
> easily-installable version of pgindent. Bruce has posted the patches he
> uses but I don't know what version of indent they're against...

The entire indent tarball with patches is on our ftp site.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +