Re: [PATCH] dtrace probes for memory manager

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)sun(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dtrace probes for memory manager
Date: 2009-12-11 14:28:54
Message-ID: 20091211142854.GB30833@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bernd Helmle escribió:

> I repeated the pgbench runs per Greg's advice (see upthread) and it
> seems there is actually a small slowdown which supports this
> argument, unfortunately. After repeating the pgbench runs with and
> without the new probes (note: i've used the new version of the
> patch, too), the numbers are going to stabilize as follows:
>
> without compiled probes: AVG(2531.68)
> with compiled probes: AVG(2511.97)

Were the probes enabled?

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2009-12-11 14:32:12 Re: Adding support for SE-Linux security
Previous Message Bernd Helmle 2009-12-11 14:22:03 Re: [PATCH] dtrace probes for memory manager