Re: XLogInsert

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: XLogInsert
Date: 2009-12-10 20:58:55
Message-ID: 20091210205855.GP15554@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jaime Casanova escribió:
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > so I'd like some independent confirmation that it does.
> >
>
> what kind of tests could show that? or simply running pgbench several
> times for 15 minutes each run could show any benefit?

Isn't the supposed performance improvement in this patch linked strongly
to backup blocks? If that's really the case, I think it would show more
prominently if you had very frequent checkpoints.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2009-12-10 21:02:54 tsearch parser overhaul
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-12-10 20:52:24 Re: Need --without-docs build switch