| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Sergey Burladyan <eshkinkot(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #5234: ALTER TABLE ... RENAME COLUMN change view definition incorrectly |
| Date: | 2009-12-10 18:02:43 |
| Message-ID: | 20091210180243.GM15554@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Robert Haas escribió:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > Hmm. Cute, but I wonder why we shouldn't just be throwing an error.
> > As I said last night, the only thing I see wrong with the current
> > behavior is that the error message isn't phrased in a way that makes
> > it obvious it's the user's fault.
>
> I think the problem we're trying to solve is that the view works but
> it isn't dumpable.
So it would also be a solution that the ALTER TABLE that renamed the
column throwed an error if there's a view that requires the name.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-12-10 18:03:39 | Re: BUG #5234: ALTER TABLE ... RENAME COLUMN change view definition incorrectly |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-12-10 17:32:55 | Re: BUG #5234: ALTER TABLE ... RENAME COLUMN change view definition incorrectly |