Re: First feature patch for plperl - draft [PATCH]

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tim Bunce <Tim(dot)Bunce(at)pobox(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: First feature patch for plperl - draft [PATCH]
Date: 2009-12-04 19:29:06
Message-ID: 20091204192906.GG4705@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

David E. Wheeler escribió:

> If it's a badly designed concept, do you have any ideas that are less bad?

I'm not sure that we want to duplicate this idea today, but in pltcl
there's a pltcl_modules table that is scanned on interpreter init and
loads user-defined code.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2009-12-04 19:30:07 Re: Block-level CRC checks
Previous Message Tim Bunce 2009-12-04 19:19:28 Re: Initial refactoring of plperl.c - rebased [PATCH]