Re: operator exclusion constraints

From: tomas(at)tuxteam(dot)de
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: operator exclusion constraints
Date: 2009-12-04 05:50:51
Message-ID: 20091204055051.GD20293@tomas
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 08:38:06PM -0800, David E. Wheeler wrote:

[...]

> "Whatever constraints"? "Operator Whatevers"? "WhatEVER"s? I like it.

drigting serioulsy off-topic: there's precedent for that in the most
venerable piece of free software; TeX has a "whatsit node" (basically an
extension mechanism).

Regards
- -- tomás
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFLGKM7Bcgs9XrR2kYRAuHFAJ0ZZYzlXHJEgwEbsraAlKVI58yLAgCfU4Cz
n+0vobY0HxROigSHUGog7QI=
=MWH+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-12-04 06:01:06 Re: Installing PL/pgSQL by default
Previous Message KaiGai Kohei 2009-12-04 05:35:10 [PATCH] Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)