Re: RFC for adding typmods to functions

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: RFC for adding typmods to functions
Date: 2009-12-03 14:09:56
Message-ID: 20091203140956.GC5059@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Pavel Stehule escribió:
> 2009/11/18 Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>:
> > On ons, 2009-11-18 at 11:46 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> >> I am not sure if SQL standard is good inspiration in this case.
> >
> > I'm not sure either, but I think it's premature to make a conclusion
> > about that without having checked at all.
>
> ok, I recheck SQL/PSM part again :)

So, did this go anywhere?

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Frank Sweetser 2009-12-03 14:24:35 Re: [Bacula-users] Catastrophic changes to PostgreSQL 8.4
Previous Message Greg Stark 2009-12-03 13:44:32 Re: Catastrophic changes to PostgreSQL 8.4