Re: ProcessUtility_hook

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ProcessUtility_hook
Date: 2009-12-01 01:35:27
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > I have applied this patch, with only a minor wording improvement:
> Uh, we weren't even done reviewing this were we?

Uh, I am new to this commitfest wiki thing, but it did have a review by
Euler Taveira de Oliveira:

and the author replied. Is there more that needs to be done?

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-12-01 01:38:18 Re: ProcessUtility_hook
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-12-01 01:33:05 Re: ProcessUtility_hook