| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: ProcessUtility_hook |
| Date: | 2009-12-01 01:35:27 |
| Message-ID: | 200912010135.nB11ZRk25773@momjian.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > I have applied this patch, with only a minor wording improvement:
>
> Uh, we weren't even done reviewing this were we?
Uh, I am new to this commitfest wiki thing, but it did have a review by
Euler Taveira de Oliveira:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=196
and the author replied. Is there more that needs to be done?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-12-01 01:38:18 | Re: ProcessUtility_hook |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-12-01 01:33:05 | Re: ProcessUtility_hook |