Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: plperl and inline functions -- first draft

From: Joshua Tolley <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alexey Klyukin <alexk(at)commandprompt(dot)com>,Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: plperl and inline functions -- first draft
Date: 2009-11-29 22:29:08
Message-ID: 20091129222908.GN3803@eddie (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 10:15:40PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Joshua Tolley <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > Makes sense on both counts. Thanks for the help. How does the attached look?
> Applied with minor corrections, mainly around the state save/restore
> logic.  I also put in some code to fix the memory leak noted by Tim Bunce,
> but am waiting for some confirmation that it's right before
> back-patching the pre-existing bug of the same ilk.
> 			regards, tom lane

Yay, and thanks. For the record, I'm can't claim to know whether your fix is
the Right Thing or not, so I'm witholding comment.

Joshua Tolley / eggyknap
End Point Corporation

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alex HunsakerDate: 2009-11-29 22:38:50
Subject: Re: Writeable CTE patch
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-11-29 21:46:29
Subject: Re: Patch: Remove gcc dependency in definition of inline functions

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group