On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 10:15:40PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Joshua Tolley <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > Makes sense on both counts. Thanks for the help. How does the attached look?
> Applied with minor corrections, mainly around the state save/restore
> logic. I also put in some code to fix the memory leak noted by Tim Bunce,
> but am waiting for some confirmation that it's right before
> back-patching the pre-existing bug of the same ilk.
> regards, tom lane
Yay, and thanks. For the record, I'm can't claim to know whether your fix is
the Right Thing or not, so I'm witholding comment.
Joshua Tolley / eggyknap
End Point Corporation
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Alex Hunsaker||Date: 2009-11-29 22:38:50|
|Subject: Re: Writeable CTE patch|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2009-11-29 21:46:29|
|Subject: Re: Patch: Remove gcc dependency in definition of inline functions |