Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: ecpg & 8.3 -> 8.4 migration

From: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bosco Rama <postgres(at)boscorama(dot)com>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org,pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org,Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ecpg & 8.3 -> 8.4 migration
Date: 2009-11-21 20:18:33
Message-ID: 20091121201833.GA18156@feivel.credativ.lan (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-interfaces
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 07:02:11PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Upon poking around in the ecpg sources, I discover that it has its own
> list of "unreserved" keywords and pays no attention whatsoever to the
> core grammar's unreserved_keyword list.  I can hardly find words to
> express my dissatisfaction with that.  The unreserved_keyword list might

I cannot agree more. Sorry about that, it seems this one got forgotten. I
wasn't aware of this blunder.

Thanks for fixing it Tom.

Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo/Skype: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes(at)jabber(dot)org
VfL Borussia! Forca Barca! Go SF 49ers! Use: Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2009-11-21 20:26:11
Subject: Re: Hot standby and removing VACUUM FULL
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2009-11-21 20:18:31
Subject: Re: Proposal: USING clause for DO statement

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Mark RichardsonDate: 2009-11-21 20:49:33
Subject: Re: ecpg & 8.3 -> 8.4 migration
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-11-21 00:02:11
Subject: Re: ecpg & 8.3 -> 8.4 migration

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group