Re: ecpg & 8.3 -> 8.4 migration

From: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bosco Rama <postgres(at)boscorama(dot)com>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ecpg & 8.3 -> 8.4 migration
Date: 2009-11-21 20:18:33
Message-ID: 20091121201833.GA18156@feivel.credativ.lan
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces

On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 07:02:11PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Upon poking around in the ecpg sources, I discover that it has its own
> list of "unreserved" keywords and pays no attention whatsoever to the
> core grammar's unreserved_keyword list. I can hardly find words to
> express my dissatisfaction with that. The unreserved_keyword list might

I cannot agree more. Sorry about that, it seems this one got forgotten. I
wasn't aware of this blunder.

Thanks for fixing it Tom.

Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo/Skype: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes(at)jabber(dot)org
VfL Borussia! Forca Barca! Go SF 49ers! Use: Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2009-11-21 20:26:11 Re: Hot standby and removing VACUUM FULL
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-11-21 20:18:31 Re: Proposal: USING clause for DO statement

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Richardson 2009-11-21 20:49:33 Re: ecpg & 8.3 -> 8.4 migration
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-11-21 00:02:11 Re: ecpg & 8.3 -> 8.4 migration