Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable?

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Rod Taylor <rod(dot)taylor(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable?
Date: 2009-10-15 18:07:01
Message-ID: 20091015180701.GA29191@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 10:22:52AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > (I'd bet lunch that the one about add_missing_from is bogus, too,
> > or could easily be made so. mysql isn't forgiving about missing
> > FROM items, so it's hard to believe that they have a lot of such
> > things no matter how little they care about Postgres.)
>
> OpenACS does the old-style DELETEs without a subselect, so they rely
> on add-missing-from for that. I had to debug this for another user.

Is OpenACS getting enough new deployments to fix this?

Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Mielke 2009-10-15 18:11:18 Re: Rejecting weak passwords
Previous Message Dave Page 2009-10-15 18:02:55 Re: Rejecting weak passwords