Re: Partitioned table question

From: Alan Hodgson <ahodgson(at)reinvent(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Partitioned table question
Date: 2009-10-14 20:27:16
Message-ID: 200910141327.16585@hal.medialogik.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wednesday 14 October 2009, Reid Thompson <reid(dot)thompson(at)ateb(dot)com> wrote:
> So we know have data in ~30 partitioned tables.
> Our requirements now necessitate adding some columns to all these tables
> ( done ) which will get populated via batch sql for the older tables and
> by normal processing as we move forward.
>
> The batch update is going to result in dead tuples in the older tables.
> What would be the recommended way to recover this dead space?
> Vacuum full children tables + reindex children tables? or....
>

cluster's faster.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2009-10-14 21:24:04 Re: could not open process token: error code 5
Previous Message Reid Thompson 2009-10-14 20:05:04 Re: Partitioned table question