| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING |
| Date: | 2009-10-08 18:56:57 |
| Message-ID: | 20091008185657.GE5510@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane escribió:
> I wrote:
> > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> >> BTW what was the conclusion of the idea about having three separate
> >> nodes Insert, Delete, Update instead of a single Dml node?
>
> > If we stick with a single node type then I'd suggest calling it
> > something like ModifyTable.
>
> I'm starting to work on this patch now. After looking at it a bit,
> it seems to me that keeping it as one node is probably marginally
> preferable to making three nodes; but I still do not like the "Dml"
> name. Does anyone have a problem with the ModifyTable suggestion,
> or a better idea?
Does it affect how is it going to look in EXPLAIN output?
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2009-10-08 18:57:13 | Re: Writeable CTEs and side effects |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-10-08 18:52:55 | Re: Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING |