Re: Rules: A Modest Proposal

On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 02:53:56PM +0100, Andrew Gierth wrote:
> Here are a couple of the more common ones:
>
> 1) any reference in an insert rule to NEW.col where col has a volatile
> default, or the expression in the insert statement was volatile, or
> the expression's value is changed by the insert, will do the wrong
> thing:

ISTM it may be possible to use the new WITH construct here. So the rule
evaluation for the following

> create table t (a integer);
> create table t_log (a integer);
> create rule t_ins AS ON insert TO t do also insert into t_log values (NEW.a);
> insert into t values (floor(random()*1000)::integer);

becomes something like:

WITH NEW AS (
insert into t values (floor(random()*1000)::integer);
RETURNING *
)
insert into t_log values (NEW.a);

Would this not have the required semantics?

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Please line up in a tree and maintain the heap invariant while
> boarding. Thank you for flying nlogn airlines.