Re: Rules: A Modest Proposal

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Rules: A Modest Proposal
Date: 2009-10-05 12:46:48
Message-ID: 200910051246.n95CkmC12734@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> Could this be done with a trigger? Yes, but on the plus rules side:
>
> * It's faster
> * It's easier to write
> * It's immediately viewable as to what is going on with a \d mytable
> * Dropping it won't leave an unused function around
> * We can still do ALTER TABLE DISABLE TRIGGER ALL
>
> I can give more examples, if you like, but removing a major feature of
> Postgres with no real justificatgion seems a bit hasty, to say the least.

Agreed, here is another rules example that logs table changes to a log
table:

http://www.postgresql.org/files/documentation/books/aw_pgsql/node124.html

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Boszormenyi Zoltan 2009-10-05 13:23:28 Re: Review of "SQLDA support for ECPG"
Previous Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2009-10-05 12:30:57 Re: Rules: A Modest Proposal