| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Rules: A Modest Proposal |
| Date: | 2009-10-05 02:01:43 |
| Message-ID: | 20091005020143.GB4977@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas escribió:
> > While I don't agree with David Fetter's premise, I think rehashing how
> > we handle VIEWs would be a good step towards updatable views. Right
> > now, the implementation of that is stalled precisely because of the rule
> > system.
>
> This is the last I remember hearing of it, which seems to suggest that
> only a week's worth of work (maybe a bit more for those of us who are
> not Tom Lane) is needed:
Right, that's exactly what I meant. Note that a week's worth of Tom
work in that area is probably measured in months for anybody else ("a
bit more" in your words), and this fits my definition of "rehashing view
handling".
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-10-05 02:07:50 | Re: Triggers on columns |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-10-05 01:54:13 | Re: Privileges and inheritance |