From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Joshua Tolley <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com>, jd <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: syslog_line_prefix |
Date: | 2009-09-28 18:13:52 |
Message-ID: | 20090928181352.GE5269@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas escribió:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> > Tom Lane escribió:
> >> [ please trim the quoted material a bit, folks ]
> >>
> >> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> >> > 2009/9/28 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> >> >> The problem with having the syslogger send the data directly to an
> >> >> external process is that the external process might be unable to
> >> >> process the data as fast as syslogger is sending it. I'm not sure
> >> >> exactly what will happen in that case, but it will definitely be bad.
> >>
> >> This is the same issue already raised with respect to syslog versus
> >> syslogger, ie, some people would rather lose log data than have the
> >> backends block waiting for it to be written.
> >
> > That could be made configurable; i.e. let the user choose whether to
> > lose messages or to make everybody wait.
>
> I think the behavior I was proposing was neither "drop" nor "wait",
> but "buffer". Not sure how people feel about that.
Given an arbitrary increase in log rate during an arbitrary length of
time, any buffer you keep will be filled.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Petr Jelinek | 2009-09-28 18:28:05 | Re: [PATCH] DefaultACLs |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2009-09-28 18:10:34 | Re: plperl returning setof foo[] |