Re: TODO item: Allow more complex user/database default GUC settings

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: TODO item: Allow more complex user/database default GUC settings
Date: 2009-09-21 16:23:44
Message-ID: 20090921162344.GG29793@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas escribió:

> So here's the followup question - do you intend to do one of those
> things for this CommitFest, or should we mark this as Returned with
> Feedback once Bernd posts the rest of his review?

What feedback is it supposed to be returned with? Precisely what I
wanted is some feedback on the general idea. Brendan's "I like the
approach" is good, but is it enough to deter a later veto from someone
else?

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-09-21 16:24:59 Re: TODO item: Allow more complex user/database default GUC settings
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-09-21 15:59:45 Re: generic copy options