From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | decibel <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
Cc: | Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org mailing list postgres" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Pg Docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] What happens when syslog gets blocked? |
Date: | 2009-09-03 22:04:44 |
Message-ID: | 20090903220444.GH6378@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-general |
decibel wrote:
> On Aug 6, 2009, at 2:00 PM, Bill Moran wrote:
> >Well ... "life better" really depends on which failure scenario you're
> >more comfortable with ... personally, I'd rather lose log messages
> >than
> >have the DB system go down. Of course, if auditing is critical to
> >your
> >scenario, then your priorities are different ...
>
> Bingo. I'm thinking we should make mention of this in the docs...
I propose the following patch.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
collector-blocks.patch | text/x-diff | 1.1 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Reid | 2009-09-04 15:15:36 | 8.4: suppress_redundant_updates trigger vs. "Upsert" logic |
Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2009-09-03 18:32:10 | Re: Postgres Sql7.3 Update |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jerry LeVan | 2009-09-03 22:20:47 | Re: Snow Leopard and plpython problem |
Previous Message | Bill Moran | 2009-09-03 22:02:50 | Re: query speed question |