Re: DELETE syntax on JOINS

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Jean-Michel Pouré <jm(at)poure(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: DELETE syntax on JOINS
Date: 2009-08-22 15:17:00
Message-ID: 200908221517.n7MFH0K17833@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jean-Michel Pour wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> Dear Friends,
>
> First, thank you very much for considering a fix on the GROUP BY issue.
> I am starting a new thread about another issue:
>
> It seems that DELETE cannot understand INNER JOINS and needs HAVING.
>
> Read:
> http://drupal.org/node/555562 (main message)
> http://drupal.org/node/555648
>
> I don't see why PostgreSQL would not be able to run queries like:
>
> DELETE h
> FROM history AS h
> INNER JOIN term_node AS tn ON (h.nid = tn.nid)
> INNER JOIN term_data AS td ON (td.tid = tn.tid)
> WHERE h.uid = 2067 AND td.vid = 2
>
> Ultimately, why not allow:
>
> DELETE h, tn
> FROM history AS h
> INNER JOIN term_node AS tn ON (h.nid = tn.nid)
> INNER JOIN term_data AS td ON (td.tid = tn.tid)
> WHERE h.uid = 2067 AND td.vid = 2
>
> IMHO this would improve compliance towards other database systems. To me
> this seems to be in the reasonable scope of compatibility.

Which "other database systems"? Only MySQL? If it is MySQL-only, we
are unlikely to add it.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-08-22 15:59:07 Resjunk sort columns, Heikki's index-only quals patch, and bug #5000
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-08-22 15:14:27 Re: Index-only quals