Re: FDW-based dblink

From: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: FDW-based dblink
Date: 2009-08-14 07:20:15
Message-ID: 20090814160056.9A04.52131E4D@oss.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:

> In fact, by using 2PC without a recovery system you
> can end up with a transaction that's prepared but never committed or
> aborted, requiring an admin to remove it manually, which is even worse than
> not using 2PC to begin with.

Yes, true. But I think "hard-to-use" is better than "unable-to-do".
If needed, we can develop some recovery systems working with the
dblink together, no?

Regards,
---
ITAGAKI Takahiro
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Meskes 2009-08-14 07:51:44 Re: CommitFest 2009-07: Remaining Patches
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2009-08-14 06:40:19 Re: FDW-based dblink