Re: Alpha releases: How to tag

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Alpha releases: How to tag
Date: 2009-08-10 13:17:04
Message-ID: 200908101617.04331.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Monday 03 August 2009 17:44:32 Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> > Does it need a version number change? Maybe just a tag (no branch) is
> > all that is required.
>
> I think that we do want the alpha releases to identify themselves as
> such. And we want a marker in CVS as to what state the alpha release
> corresponds to. Peter's label-and-undo approach seems like a kluge;
> and it doesn't scale to consider the possibility that we might
> want to re-release an alpha after fixing some particularly evil bug.
> A tag without a branch won't handle that either.
>
> I feel that making a branch is the way to go. If we try to get away
> with a shortcut, we'll probably regret it.

Well then, naming:

Branch: ???
Tag: REL8_5_ALPHA1

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-08-10 13:42:21 Re: Patch for 8.5, transformationHook
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2009-08-10 13:14:49 Re: Adding error message "source"