From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Adding error message "source" |
Date: | 2009-08-10 15:46:19 |
Message-ID: | 200908101546.n7AFkJZ22339@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 19:04, Peter Eisentraut<peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> > On Thursday 06 August 2009 17:33:40 Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I don't think there'd be much logical difficulty in having an output
> >> field (ie, CSV column or log_line_prefix escape) that represents a
> >> classification of the PID, say as "postmaster, backend, AV worker,
> >> AV launcher, bgwriter, ...". ?It would only require changing things
> >> in one place, whereas your original proposal seemed mighty open-ended.
> >
> > You might be able to achieve that if you use the %q escape and put something
> > after the %q that you can search for.
>
> You could do part of it, but you could still not differ them from each
> other. And really, it seems very much like a kludge to me. I'd rather
> have a "proper field" for it.
Is this a TODO?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-08-10 15:59:28 | Re: machine-readable explain output v4 |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-08-10 15:43:26 | Re: Shipping documentation untarred |