Re: Split-up ECPG patches

From: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, hs(at)cybertec(dot)at
Subject: Re: Split-up ECPG patches
Date: 2009-08-09 17:04:40
Message-ID: 20090809170440.GB20702@feivel.credativ.lan
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 05:29:06PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> around nontrivial expressions. So I'd like to see an actual case made
> that there's a strong reason for not requiring FROM/IN in ecpg.

I guess there's only one, compatibility.

Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo/Skype: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes(at)jabber(dot)org
Go VfL Borussia! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-08-09 17:09:42 Re: Split-up ECPG patches
Previous Message Michael Meskes 2009-08-09 17:03:24 Re: Split-up ECPG patches