Re: Docbook toolchain interfering with patch review?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Docbook toolchain interfering with patch review?
Date: 2009-08-09 01:10:37
Message-ID: 200908090110.n791AbZ07851@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas wrote:
> Yeah. I usually build the docs and read them if I'm making.... er
> proposing... an extensive change, but for simple stuff I just edit the
> SGML and figure that if it looks sane it probably is.
>
> I certainly don't test the doc portions of patches I review unless I
> see something sketchy in the markup.
>
> But I can't say I've ever had much trouble building the docs. I find
> it a bit odd that "make" in the doc directory does nothing; and "make"
> in doc/src does nothing, but "make" in doc/src/sgml does what you
> expect. I also find the slowness of openjade to be pretty annoying.
> But those are minor warts, not serious inconveniences that hinder
> reviewing.

FYI, bulding PDFs used to take _days_; we finally found and worked
around that openjade bug.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2009-08-09 01:11:21 Re: Patch for 8.5, transformationHook
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-08-09 00:53:55 a short trip in the wayback machine