| From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: dblink bulk operations |
| Date: | 2009-08-06 16:37:58 |
| Message-ID: | 20090806163758.GK4185@fetter.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 12:28:15PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> David Fetter wrote:
>>
>> For what it's worth, DBI-Link provides a lot of this.
>
> Indeed, but that assumes that perl+DBI+DBD::Pg is available, which
> is by no means always the case. If we're going to have a dblink
> module ISTM it should be capable of reasonable bulk operations.
I didn't mean to suggest that you should use DBI-Link, just that it's
a requirement that's come up in very similar contexts to that of
dblink.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2009-08-06 16:49:01 | Re: dblink bulk operations |
| Previous Message | Sam Mason | 2009-08-06 16:34:52 | Re: the case for machine-readable error fields |