Re: Proposal: More portable way to support 64bit platforms

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Tsutomu Yamada <tsutomu(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Proposal: More portable way to support 64bit platforms
Date: 2009-08-04 15:09:07
Message-ID: 200908041809.07851.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tuesday 04 August 2009 17:56:41 Tom Lane wrote:
> The other thing that I would say is a non-negotiable minimum requirement
> is that the patch include the necessary configure pushups so it does not
> break machines without uintptr_t.

There is AC_TYPE_UINTPTR_T, so that should be easy.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2009-08-04 15:09:47 Re: Alpha Releases: Docs?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-08-04 15:06:47 Re: Alpha Releases: Docs?