Re: Sampling profiler updated

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Subject: Re: Sampling profiler updated
Date: 2009-07-21 13:13:41
Message-ID: 200907211613.41673.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tuesday 21 July 2009 09:09:54 Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> > * Is it ok we have two versions of profiling? (this and dtrace
> > probes)
>
> Can't comment on this, never used dtrace before, don't have a version
> of it on my production systems.

Well, the objection remains: We already have dtrace support, and dtrace or
dtrace-like systems are spreading to many operating systems, so one wonders
whether it is useful to clutter the code with another probing system instead
of putting some resources, say, into getting systemtap up to speed.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-07-21 13:21:43 Re: git revisited
Previous Message pg 2009-07-21 13:10:45 Re: [PATCH v4] Avoid manual shift-and-test logic in AllocSetFreeIndex