Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [GENERAL] large object does not exist afterpg_migrator

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Jamie Fox <jfox(at)directcommerce(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] large object does not exist afterpg_migrator
Date: 2009-07-15 16:28:57
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
Jamie Fox wrote:

> Hi -
> REINDEX INDEX pg_largeobject_loid_pn_index;
> This seems to have fixed the problem, lo_open of lob data is working again -
> now to see how vacuumlo likes it.

So did it work?

Alvaro Herrera                      
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Fujii MasaoDate: 2009-07-15 16:45:03
Subject: Re: Synch Rep for CommitFest 2009-07
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2009-07-15 16:27:54
Subject: Re: hot standby - merged up to CVS HEAD

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: CGDate: 2009-07-15 16:40:39
Subject: Automatic type conversion
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2009-07-15 16:23:08
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_migrator not setting values ofsequences?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group