| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Odd historical fact about Bison |
| Date: | 2009-07-09 23:24:53 |
| Message-ID: | 200907100124.53862.andres@anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Friday 10 July 2009 00:58:01 Josh Berkus wrote:
> Tom,
>
> > As best I can tell, they ended up not changing the API, and there is no
> > reason we shouldn't depend on the feature and continue to claim that we
> > work with bison>= 1.875. Does anyone feel uncomfortable with that?
> > (It may be of mostly academic interest anyway, since I bet few people
> > are still using such old bison versions. The only reason I've got one
> > is for intentional trailing-edge compatibility testing...)
>
> The real question is slow-to-upgrade OSes like HP-UX, AIX, OpenBSD and
> Solaris. What version of Bison are they shipping with?
Most current solaris 10/5.10 ships with 1.875
Andres
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dickson S. Guedes | 2009-07-09 23:35:35 | Re: Odd historical fact about Bison |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2009-07-09 23:11:31 | Re: Odd historical fact about Bison |