Re: Maintenance Policy?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Maintenance Policy?
Date: 2009-07-07 19:59:36
Message-ID: 20090707195935.GP7694@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Jul 7, 2009, at 11:59 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
>>> And it only goes back to 8.0
>>
>> Huh, true :-( This should be fixed.
>
> Yeah. Or we should have a table. I could create one in the wiki, I
> guess, but I would assume that the core team would want to have formal
> control over scheduled maintenance expirations…

The web team already has a table, and it is published as the RSS I
linked to. If you want it in another format I think it should be on the
main website (not wiki), derived from the table already present.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dimitri Fontaine 2009-07-07 20:01:57 Re: Re: Synch Rep: direct transfer of WAL file from the primary to the standby
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-07-07 19:45:24 Re: *_collapse_limit, geqo_threshold