Re: Multi-Dimensional Histograms

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Nathan Boley <npboley(at)gmail(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Multi-Dimensional Histograms
Date: 2009-06-29 22:56:44
Message-ID: 20090629225644.GJ21081@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 06:43:35PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 01:28:01PM -0700, Nathan Boley wrote:
> >> ... They dismiss singular value decomposition and the discrete
> >> wavelet transform as being too parametric ( which is silly, IMHO
> >> )
>
> > Should we have a separate discussion about eigenvalues? Wavelets?
>
> I think it'd be a short discussion: what will you do with
> non-numeric datatypes? We probably don't really want to assume
> anything stronger than that the datatype has a total ordering.

That sounds about like the discussion we needed unless we later decide
we need to do something special for approximations of R^n :)

Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2009-06-29 23:16:24 Re: pre-proposal: permissions made easier
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-06-29 22:49:54 Re: Query progress indication - an implementation