| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Stuck cvs lock on anoncvs repository |
| Date: | 2009-06-28 00:09:19 |
| Message-ID: | 20090627210835.S56412@hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Sat, 27 Jun 2009, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Stefan Kaltenbrunner escribió:
>> Greg Stark wrote:
>>> do we not have --delete on the rsync command? why doesn't the problem
>>> go away on the next sync if we do?
>>
>> we do use --delete - but nobody commited after we tagged and before the
>> problem got reported so the regular on-commit code didn't kick in and
>> forced syncs only happen once a day.
>
> Are we worried about bandwidth wastage that we don't run it more often?
More often then when ppl commit? What would be the point to that?
AT least, the way I understood it setup, when someone does a commit, it
initiates a push to the anoncvs repository ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-06-28 01:49:51 | Re: [HACKERS] pull raw text of a message by message-id |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-06-27 22:23:23 | Re: Stuck cvs lock on anoncvs repository |