Re: [sysadmins] List moderation - need a break!

I'm kinda curious as to which lists this 'unstustainable' is on ... I just
checked pgsql-general ... out of 10 messages that are in the queue right
now:

7 are subscribe / set requests
1 is spam from Jun 11th
2 are legit postings from Jun 11th (which I've just approved)

pgsql-admin: 25 messages in queue

4 subscribe / set
20 spam
1 non-spam ... approved from the 10th

Okay, so that one has a huge noise:signal ratio

On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Dave Page wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Bruce Momjian<bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>>
>>> I was thinking of the "Subject" line.
>>
>> What's Re: in russian? :-p
>>
>>> Also, we can let subscribed
>>> people have anything they want; ?this would only be for unsubscribed
>>> items that have to be moderated.
>>
>> I'd be happier with that if we allowed users of one list to post to
>> another without subscription, as was recently discussed. That would at
>> least prevent x-posted threads losing messages.
>
> Yes, we should do that too. Right now obviously the moderation load is
> unsustainable; we can't keep going with our current system.
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
> EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
>
> + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
>

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664