Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCH] Automatic client certificate selectionsupport for libpq v1

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Seth Robertson <in-pgsql-hackers(at)baka(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Automatic client certificate selectionsupport for libpq v1
Date: 2009-05-11 14:43:17
Message-ID: 20090511144317.GC8689@alvh.no-ip.org (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Magnus Hagander wrote:

> Another thought: if we were to make ourselves support multiple SSL
> libraries (that has been suggested before - at that point, people wanted
> GnuTLS), we could also add support for Windows SChannel, which I'm sure
> some win32 people would certainly prefer - much easier to do SSL
> deployments within an existing MS infrastructure...

If we were to support multiple libraries, would they be selected at run
time or compile time?  If only compile time, how would it work for the
Windows installer with the SChannel thingy --- would they have to
distribute two separate packages, for OpenSSL and SChannel?

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-05-11 14:46:41
Subject: Re: SELECT ... FOR UPDATE [WAIT integer | NOWAIT] for 8.5
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2009-05-11 14:35:29
Subject: Re: SSL cert chains patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group