Re: strict version of version_stamp.pl

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com
Subject: Re: strict version of version_stamp.pl
Date: 2009-05-08 22:18:21
Message-ID: 200905090118.22627.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Saturday 09 May 2009 00:50:28 Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > Yes I apologize for that. Git reacted differently than I expected to a
> > "git diff". I have since reposted a proper patch.
>
> mmm ... I've recently been forced into using git for another project,
> and I find myself mystified as to why anyone would want to use it.
> Seems like baroqueness and unexpected behaviors are all over the thing.

Obviously, an unchecked cvs diff would have produced the same garbage. Any
other problems?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-05-08 22:20:02 Re: Show method of index
Previous Message Khee Chin 2009-05-08 22:13:38 Re: Show method of index