Re: Can't drop constraint?

From: Michael Monnerie <michael(dot)monnerie(at)is(dot)it-management(dot)at>
To: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Can't drop constraint?
Date: 2009-05-06 18:54:20
Message-ID: 200905062054.20847@zmi.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On Mittwoch 06 Mai 2009 Tom Lane wrote:
> No.  A primary key or unique constraint is implemented by creating
> a unique index (and, for PK, also by creating NOT NULL constraints
> on the columns).  After that, the only visible difference is that
> there's an entry in pg_constraint, or not.  There are some minor
> behavioral differences --- if memory serves, you need a PK constraint
> entry to persuade a REFERENCES constraint that it should consider
> a given column as the default reference target --- but no performance
> difference.

To take it to a point: Creating an index has advantages over
constraints, without any disadvantage? So I will always only use
indices, not constraints, to have a more uniform db model.

mfg zmi
--
// Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc ----- http://it-management.at
// Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31 .network.your.ideas.
// PGP Key: "curl -s http://zmi.at/zmi.asc | gpg --import"
// Fingerprint: AC19 F9D5 36ED CD8A EF38 500E CE14 91F7 1C12 09B4
// Keyserver: wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net Key-ID: 1C1209B4

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yves D'Astous 2009-05-06 18:56:49 Why postgresql 8.3.5 created temporary files of size less then work_mem on disk ?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-05-06 13:54:13 Re: Can't drop constraint?