On Tuesday 28 April 2009, Whit Armstrong <armstrong(dot)whit(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Additionally are there any clear choices w/ regard to filesystem
> types? Our choices would be xfs, ext3, or ext4.
xfs consistently delivers much higher sequential throughput than ext3 (up to
100%), at least on my hardware.
--
Even a sixth-grader can figure out that you can’t borrow money to pay off
your debt