Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: XML documentation question

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: XML documentation question
Date: 2009-04-27 20:00:11
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-docs
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On Monday 27 April 2009 20:20:29 Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > I updated the text to:
> > >
> > >     The following functions return XML Schema documents similar to the
> > >     mappings produced by the corresponding functions above:
> OK, that is what is in our SGML now.
> > Sorry, that is completely wrong.
> You did just email "sounds good", but were mistaken, right?

But that was to Tom proposal, which is completely different (yes -- one
word can change the meaning of a sentence).

I agree the paragraph (even with Tom's rework) is a bit confusing to the
uninitiated.  Maybe the subsection could be reflowed so that each
function is described along the corresponding XML Schema function (to
table_to_xml and table_to_xmlschema, later query_to_xml and
query_to_xmlschema and so on).

Alvaro Herrera                      
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2009-04-27 20:02:32
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Proofreading adjustments forfirst two parts of documentation
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2009-04-27 19:56:28
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Proofreading adjustments for first two parts of documentation

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group