Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df
Date: 2009-04-17 20:42:31
Message-ID: 20090417204231.GK7709@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

David Fetter wrote:

> Is this any better?

So what happens if I do \dfaQ? It should throw an error, yes?

This help line:

> + fprintf(output, _(" \\df[S+] [PATTERN] list functions. Add a, n, t, w for aggregate, normal, trigger, window\n"));

needs shortening to below 80 chars (or maybe split it in two lines.
Just make sure they are a single translation item).

It also seems like we're missing tab completion support for this.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2009-04-17 20:52:06 Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df
Previous Message Marko Kreen 2009-04-17 20:16:44 Re: [rfc] unicode escapes for extended strings