Re: Replacing plpgsql's lexer

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Replacing plpgsql's lexer
Date: 2009-04-17 17:06:32
Message-ID: 20090417170632.GC10700@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 01:01:39PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> David Fetter wrote:
>
> > Speaking of standard_conforming_strings, I know it's late, but if
> > we make it a requirement now, a lot of problems just go away.
> > Yes, it's inconvenient, but we're making lots of big changes, so
> > one more shouldn't halt adoption.
>
> 16 days too late ...

Depends. If we've found show-stopping bugs, as it appears we may have
done, in not requiring standards_conforming_strings, we can't just
pull a MySQL and ship anyhow.

Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sam Mason 2009-04-17 17:46:25 Re: [rfc] unicode escapes for extended strings
Previous Message Kris Jurka 2009-04-17 17:05:32 Re: No hash join across partitioned tables?