Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Mario Splivalo <mario(dot)splivalo(at)megafon(dot)hr>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index
Date: 2009-04-09 21:59:42
Message-ID: 200904092159.n39Lxh201358@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Mario Splivalo wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Mario Splivalo <mario(dot)splivalo(at)megafon(dot)hr> writes:
> >> Hope this is ok. How can I submit patch for 8.3 documentation?
> >
> > I think you just did. Applied, thanks.
>
> I pulled the source from CVS HEAD branch, I see that is 8.4
> documentation (for instance, 'cardinality' function is nonexistant for 8.3).
>
> > PS: why'd you omit unnest()?
>
> I overlooked it, I guess. Sorry.

Did unnest() get added properly too?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-04-09 22:23:41 Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-04-07 23:45:24 Re: log_min_duration_statement units