Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf
Date: 2009-03-30 19:51:34
Message-ID: 200903301951.n2UJpZY08336@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> >> I guess that'd work but it might be overkill.
> >
> > The real bottom line is that *all* the proposals for generic init
> > functions are overkill. ?We have no evidence that we need one and
> > no certainty about what the requirements for it would be if we did.
> >
> > I think we should just do PQinitOpenSSL(2 args) and be done with it.
>
> I was pushing for generic PQinit, but have come around and agree with
> this point of view.

OK, we are _go_ then.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dimitri Fontaine 2009-03-30 19:59:41 Re: psql \d* and system objects
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2009-03-30 19:50:01 Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf