Re: TODO item

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
Cc: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: TODO item
Date: 2009-03-28 14:18:39
Message-ID: 200903281418.n2SEIdn04481@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Gierth wrote:
> >>>>> "Jaime" == Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> writes:
>
> Jaime> In the TODO list there is an item "[D] Completed itemAdd
> Jaime> array_agg() and UNNEST functions for arrays " marked as done
> Jaime> but 5 items below there is: "Add SQL-standard array_agg() and
> Jaime> unnest() array functions " it's the same item so this one
> Jaime> should be removed... or there is a difference between the
> Jaime> array_agg() and unnest() implemented versus SQL-standard
> Jaime> array_agg() and unnest()?
>
> The array_agg() does, I believe, match the standard one, at least
> my reading of the spec doesn't reveal any obvious issues there.
>
> The unnest() implementation is largely unrelated to the standard one,
> which is impossible to provide without LATERAL.

I removed the duplicate item; we can add more details about what
additional functionality we need once we get user feedback.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2009-03-28 14:21:47 Re: Should SET ROLE inherit config params?
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2009-03-28 13:25:02 Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf