Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1704)

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Joshua Brindle <method(at)manicmethod(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
Subject: Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1704)
Date: 2009-03-09 13:35:47
Message-ID: 20090309133547.GB8123@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> > KaiGai Kohei wrote:
> >> As I promised last week, SE-PostgreSQL patches are revised here:
>
> > The patch adds permission checks to SET/SHOW. If that's useful
> > functionality, it would be nice to see that as a separate patch, not
> > requiring SE-Linux.
>
> My goodness. This patch seems to be going FAR beyond what I thought
> its charter was.

I agree. I thought the idea was that the first round of SE-PostgreSQL
additions would be to add SE hooks for permissions that PG already
implements. Other permissions would then be implemented in a PG-way
first, and SE hooks then added to those later.

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dickson S. Guedes 2009-03-09 14:01:14 Re: Sampling Profler for Postgres
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-03-09 13:35:05 Re: status of remaining patches