Re: [BUGS] BUG #4660: float functions return -0

From: ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #4660: float functions return -0
Date: 2009-02-17 01:14:05
Message-ID: 20090217095333.F17C.52131E4D@oss.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

I reported the following bug to -bugs, and I'd like to discuss
whether we need to fix the issue or how to fix it.

"ITAGAKI Takahiro" <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> Bug reference: 4660
> PostgreSQL version: 8.3.3
> Operating system: Fedora 8
> Description: float functions return -0
> Details:
> Float8 versions of trunc(), ceil() and round() could return -0 on some
> version of glibc.
>
> postgres=# SELECT pg_catalog.trunc((-0.1)::float8);
> -0
> postgres=# SELECT pg_catalog.ceil((-0.1)::float8);
> -0
> postgres=# SELECT pg_catalog.round((-0.1)::float8);
> -0

We already have some codes to avoid -0 float8um (unary minus),
but there are no protection in trunc(), ceil() and round() at least.
It is platform-dependent behavior (msvcrt doesn't return -0), and there is
a difference between float8 and numeric (numeric doesn't support -0).

1. Remove 'avoid -0' from float8um because -0 is a possible value
for floating point numbers.
2. Add 'avoid -0' codes to those functions.
(Are there any places where we also add it?)
3. Move 'avoid -0' codes to float8out() and float8send().
'-0' could be stored in database, but users receives only '+0'.

Fixes might be needed by float4 versions.
I'll write a patch when we come to a decision.

Regards,
---
ITAGAKI Takahiro
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-02-17 03:32:13 Re: [BUGS] BUG #4660: float functions return -0
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2009-02-16 15:15:12 Re: BUG #4661: Installation

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message KaiGai Kohei 2009-02-17 01:44:02 Re: SE-PostgreSQL and row level security
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-02-17 01:03:33 Re: Questions about parsing boolean and casting to anyelement